Would each activity unlock in a logical order, while support and accessibility information remain easy to reach?
03 · Design story
From role research to a testable learning product.
This was a portfolio response to publicly available role and course context—not an internal organisational needs analysis. Four decisions connect the opportunity, topic, learning blocks and LMS evaluation.
- 01
Research the opportunity
I reviewed the advertised role and AsureQuality Academy’s public offering. The role called for end-to-end digital learning delivery, contemporary learning technology, Canvas-aligned thinking and continuous improvement.
- 02
Choose a useful gap
A generic Food Safety Essentials topic would overlap an existing product area. I selected one high-consequence behaviour: what a worker should do when they notice a possible allergen cross-contact or labelling incident.
- 03
Define the learning blocks
I shaped a 12–15 minute mobile-first journey: recognise the risk, make a decision, see the consequence, practise Stop–Isolate–Escalate, record essential details, complete a separate final check and take a job aid to work.
- 04
Evaluate through a Canvas lens
I mapped the sequence to Modules, Pages, Assignments, Quizzes, Requirements, Gradebook and Analytics to test whether the progression, evidence and improvement loop would make sense in a real LMS.
Canvas is the design check—not an implementation claim.
The prototype was not built or administered in Canvas. I used Canvas concepts to evaluate whether the learning sequence, assessment evidence and improvement plan could translate into a coherent course architecture.
Does each performance objective produce visible evidence, and is the 80% mastery decision clear?
Could a course owner identify persistent misconceptions, friction or completion gaps and act on them?
Canvas Implementation Blueprint
For reviewers who want the proposed module structure, completion logic, evidence register and analytics plan.



